ページ

金曜日, 4月 04, 2014

『世界史の構造』英語版:メモ

                (リンク::::::::::柄谷行人本頁

どこかで柄谷が予告していた通り、『世界史の構造』英語版p.130には日本語版第二部第四章1「呪術から
宗教へ」193頁に対応する部分にオルトヴィン・ヘンスラーの主張したアジールについての学説がアニマに関
連して半頁ほど追加されている。その他、英語版序文や索引が新たについた。


  There are, however, instances of magic filling an egalitarian function
even in state societies : we see this in instances of the right of asylum. Under
it, people are freed from social constraints. The right of asylum is universal
to state societies. It possesses an ethical significance that liberates people
from social constraints and limits. This does not spring up from humanism.
Ortwin Henssler argues that the right of asylum originated in magic, not
in some ethical significance.(5) But how could something magical in nature
acquire ethical significance? In my view, the right to asylum represents the
return of suppressed mode of exchange A (that of nomadic egalitarianism)
during the period when clan society transformed into state society. In
that sense, the right to asylum harbored an ethical significance from the
start. But it was manifested in the form of a compulsion, the return of the
repressedーas, in other words,a kind of magical power. State power is not
able to touch people who claim asylum because they possess a kind of anima.

________
アジール―その歴史と諸形態: オルトヴィン・ヘンスラー, 舟木 徹男: 本
http://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/4336052271/

網野善彦、阿部謹也に多大な影響を与えたアジール論の名著。待望の初邦訳!翻訳者による、アジールを現代へと接続するための画期的論考を付す。
著者略歴
ヘンスラー,オルトヴィン
1923年シュトゥットガルト生まれ。長年バーデン・ヴュルテンベルク州の司法行政に携わり、同州の司法省で判事および省庁ディレクターとして活動。63歳で定年退職を迎え、現在もシュトゥットガルトに在住

舟木/徹男
1973年石川県生まれ。1996年京都大学文学部卒業。2007年京都大学大学院人間・環境学研究科博士後期課程単位取得満期退学。現在、龍谷大学非常勤講師

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%82%A2%E3%82%B8%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AB
アジールあるいはアサイラム(独: Asyl、仏: asile、英: asylum)は、歴史的・社会的な概念で、「聖域」「自由領域」「避難所」「無縁所」などとも呼ばれる特殊なエリアのことを意味する。ギリシア語の「ἄσυλον(侵すことのできない、神聖な場所の意)」を語源とする。具体的には、おおむね「統治権力が及ばない地域」ということになる。現代の法制度の中で近いものを探せば在外公館の内部など「治外法権(が認められた場所)」のようなものである。


http://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/0822356767/
The Structure of World History: From Modes of Production to Modes of Exchange [ペーパーバック]
Kojin Karatani (著), Michael K. Bourdaghs (翻訳)

 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Translator's Note  vii
Author's Preface to the English Translation  ix
Preface  xiii
Introduction. On Modes of Exchange  1
Part I. Mini World Systems  29
1. The Sedentary Revolution  35
2. The Gift and Magic  50
Part II. World-Empire  57
3. The State  63
4. World Money  81
5. World Empires  104
6. Universal Religions  127
Part III. The Modern World System  157
7. The Modern State  165
8. Industrial Capital  182
9. Nation  209
10. Associationism  228
Part IV. The Present and the Future  265
11. The Stages of Global Capitalism and Repetition  267
12. Toward a World Republic  285
Acknowledgments  309
Notes  311
Bibliography  339
Index

https://www.dukeupress.edu/The-Structure-of-World-History/
Read the Introduction - Duke University Press (Adobe PDF)


p.9
Table 1 Modes-of-Exchange Matrix
___________________________
B: Plunder and redistribution     A: Reciprocity
(Domination and protection)     (Gift and countergift)

C:Commodity Exchange       D: X
(Money and commodities)
___________________________

Table 2 The Modern-Social-Formation Matrix 
__________
B: State   A: Nation
C: Capital  D: X
__________


p.21
Table 3
__________________________________
Political     Stateless Asiatic    Ancient  Feudal Modern
Superstructure       state     classic   state  state
             King/       state
Economic    Clan   vassals    Citizen /  Feudal Capital / 
Base (Mode of  society  (agricultural  slave   lord /  proletariat
Production)        community)       serfs
__________________________________

p.25
Table 4
_______________________________________
Social Formation      Dominant Mode of Exchange    World System
_______________________________________
Clan           Reciprocity             Mini-system
Asiatic          Plunder and redistribution (B1)     World-empire
Ancient classical      Plunder and redistribution (B2) 
Feudal           Plunder and redistribution (B3) 
Capitalism        Commodity Exchange         World-economy
_______________________________________


p.28
Table 5 World Systems
____________________
World-empire      Mini-world system
World-economy     World republic 
(modern world system)
____________________




p.273
TABLE 6 The World - Historical Stages of Capitalism
          1750-1810    1810-1870   1870-1930    1930-1990    1990-
___________________________________________________
Global Capitalism  Mercantilism    Liberalism    Imperialism   Late capitalism  Neoliberalism
Hegemonic State            Britain             United States
Economic Policy  Imperialistic    Liberalism   Imperialistic   Liberalism     Imperialistic
Capital       Merchant     Industrial    Finance capital State-monopoly  Multinational
          capital       capital             capital       capital
World Commodity  Textiles      Light      Heavy industry Durable      information
                   industry             consumer goods
State       Absolute      Nation-state    Imperialism  Welfare state    Regionalism
         monarchy
___________________________________________________


10 件のコメント:

  1. Table1 Modes-of-ExchangeMatrix
    B: Plunder and redistribution (Domination and protection)
    C:Commodity Exchange (Money and commodities)
    A: Reciprocity
    (Gift and countergift)
    D: X
    Table2 TheModern-Social-FormationMatrix
    B: State A: Nation C: Capital D: X
    there had never been anything of the sort before.”10 This suggests that the spontaneously arising council communism represents the return of mode of exchange A in a higher dimension.

    返信削除
  2. Table1 Modes-of-ExchangeMatrix
    _______________________
    B: Plunder and redistribution     A: Reciprocity
    (Domination and protection)     (Gift and countergift)

    C:Commodity Exchange       D: X
    (Money and commodities)
    _______________________



    Table2 TheModern-Social-FormationMatrix
    __________
    B: State   A: Nation
    C: Capital  D: X
    __________
    there had never been anything of the sort before.”10 This suggests that the spontaneously arising council communism represents the return of mode of exchange A in a higher dimension.

    返信削除
  3. Table 3
    Political Superstructure
    Economic Base (Mode of Production)
    Stateless
    Clan society
    Asiatic state
    King/ vassals (agricultural community)
    Ancient classic state
    Citizen / slave
    Feudal state
    Feudal lord / serfs
    Modern state
    Capital / proletariat

    返信削除
  4. Table 3
    Political
    Superstructure

    Economic
    Base (Mode of
    Production)


    Stateless


    Clan
    society


    Asiatic
    state
    King/
    vassals
    (agricultural
    community)

    Ancient
    classic
    state
    Citizen /
    slave

    Feudal
    state

    Feudal
    lord /
    serfs

    Modern
    state

    Capital /
    proletariat

    返信削除
  5. Table3
    Political     Stateless Asiatic    Ancient  Feudal Modern
    Superstructure      state     classic  state  state
                 King/     state
    Economic    Clan   vassals    Citizen /  Feudal Capital /
    Base (Mode of  society  (agricultural  slave   lord /  proletariat
    Production)        community)       serfs







    返信削除
  6. p.25
    Table 4

    _______________________________________
    Social Formation      Dominant Mode of Exchange    World System
    _______________________________________
    Clan           Reciprocity             Mini-system
    Asiatic          Plunder and redistribution (B1)     World-empire
    Ancient classical      Plunder and redistribution (B2)
    Feudal           Plunder and redistribution (B3)
    Capitalism        Commodity Exchange         World-economy
    _______________________________________

    返信削除
  7. Table 4
    Social Formation
    Clan
    Asiatic
    Ancient classical Feudal Capitalism
    Dominant Mode of Exchange
    Reciprocity
    Plunder and redistribution (B1) Plunder and redistribution (B2) Plunder and redistribution (B3) Commodity Exchange
    World System
    Mini-system World-empire
    World-economy
    implemented only the surface trappings of the Asiatic despotic state and its attendant ideologies.

    返信削除
  8. p.28
    Table5 WorldSystems
    ____________________
    World-empire      Mini-world system
    World-economy     World republic
    (modern world system)
    ____________________

    返信削除
  9. p.9
    Table 1 Modes-of-Exchange Matrix
    _______________________
    B: Plunder and redistribution     A: Reciprocity
    (Domination and protection)     (Gift and countergift)

    C:Commodity Exchange       D: X
    (Money and commodities)
    _______________________


    Table 2 TheModern-Social-Formation Matrix
    __________
    B: State   A: Nation
    C: Capital  D: X
    __________

    p.21
    Table 3
    __________________________________
    Political     Stateless Asiatic    Ancient  Feudal Modern
    Superstructure      state     classic  state  state
                 King/     state
    Economic    Clan   vassals    Citizen /  Feudal Capital /
    Base (Mode of  society  (agricultural  slave   lord /  proletariat
    Production)        community)       serfs
    __________________________________


    p.25
    Table 4
    _______________________________________
    Social Formation      Dominant Mode of Exchange    World System
    _______________________________________
    Clan           Reciprocity             Mini-system
    Asiatic          Plunder and redistribution (B1)     World-empire
    Ancient classical      Plunder and redistribution (B2)
    Feudal           Plunder and redistribution (B3)
    Capitalism        Commodity Exchange         World-economy
    _______________________________________


    p.28
    Table5 World Systems
    ____________________
    World-empire      Mini-world system
    World-economy     World republic
    (modern world system)
    ____________________








    返信削除

  10. p.273
    TABLE 6 The World-Histolical Stages of Capitalism
              1750-1810    1810-1870   1870-1930   1930-1990    1990-
    ___________________________________________________
    Global Capitalism  Mercantilism    Liberalism    Imperialism   Late capitalism  Neoliberalism
    Hegemonic State            Britain             United States
    Economic Policy  Imperialistic    Liberalism   Imperialistic   Liberalism     Imperialistic
    Capital       Merchant     Industrial    Finance capital State-monopoly  Multinational
              capital       capital             capital       capital
    World Commodity  Textiles      Light      Heavy industry Durable      information
                       industry             consumer goods
    State       Absolute      Nation-state           Welfare state   Regionalism
             monarchy

    ___________________________________________________

    返信削除