宗教へ」193頁に対応する部分にオルトヴィン・ヘンスラーの主張したアジールについての学説がアニマに関
連して半頁ほど追加されている。その他、英語版序文や索引が新たについた。
There are, however, instances of magic filling an egalitarian function
even in state societies : we see this in instances of the right of asylum. Under
it, people are freed from social constraints. The right of asylum is universal
to state societies. It possesses an ethical significance that liberates people
from social constraints and limits. This does not spring up from humanism.
Ortwin Henssler argues that the right of asylum originated in magic, not
in some ethical significance.(5) But how could something magical in nature
acquire ethical significance? In my view, the right to asylum represents the
return of suppressed mode of exchange A (that of nomadic egalitarianism)
during the period when clan society transformed into state society. In
that sense, the right to asylum harbored an ethical significance from the
start. But it was manifested in the form of a compulsion, the return of the
repressedーas, in other words,a kind of magical power. State power is not
able to touch people who claim asylum because they possess a kind of anima.
________
アジール―その歴史と諸形態: オルトヴィン・ヘンスラー, 舟木 徹男: 本
http://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/4336052271/
網野善彦、阿部謹也に多大な影響を与えたアジール論の名著。待望の初邦訳!翻訳者による、アジールを現代へと接続するための画期的論考を付す。
著者略歴
ヘンスラー,オルトヴィン
1923年シュトゥットガルト生まれ。長年バーデン・ヴュルテンベルク州の司法行政に携わり、同州の司法省で判事および省庁ディレクターとして活動。63歳で定年退職を迎え、現在もシュトゥットガルトに在住
舟木/徹男
1973年石川県生まれ。1996年京都大学文学部卒業。2007年京都大学大学院人間・環境学研究科博士後期課程単位取得満期退学。現在、龍谷大学非常勤講師
http://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/4336052271/
網野善彦、阿部謹也に多大な影響を与えたアジール論の名著。待望の初邦訳!翻訳者による、アジールを現代へと接続するための画期的論考を付す。
著者略歴
ヘンスラー,オルトヴィン
1923年シュトゥットガルト生まれ。長年バーデン・ヴュルテンベルク州の司法行政に携わり、同州の司法省で判事および省庁ディレクターとして活動。63歳で定年退職を迎え、現在もシュトゥットガルトに在住
舟木/徹男
1973年石川県生まれ。1996年京都大学文学部卒業。2007年京都大学大学院人間・環境学研究科博士後期課程単位取得満期退学。現在、龍谷大学非常勤講師
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%82%A2%E3%82%B8%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AB
アジールあるいはアサイラム(独: Asyl、仏: asile、英: asylum)は、歴史的・社会的な概念で、「聖域」「自由領域」「避難所」「無縁所」などとも呼ばれる特殊なエリアのことを意味する。ギリシア語の「ἄσυλον(侵すことのできない、神聖な場所の意)」を語源とする。具体的には、おおむね「統治権力が及ばない地域」ということになる。現代の法制度の中で近いものを探せば在外公館の内部など「治外法権(が認められた場所)」のようなものである。
アジールあるいはアサイラム(独: Asyl、仏: asile、英: asylum)は、歴史的・社会的な概念で、「聖域」「自由領域」「避難所」「無縁所」などとも呼ばれる特殊なエリアのことを意味する。ギリシア語の「ἄσυλον(侵すことのできない、神聖な場所の意)」を語源とする。具体的には、おおむね「統治権力が及ばない地域」ということになる。現代の法制度の中で近いものを探せば在外公館の内部など「治外法権(が認められた場所)」のようなものである。
http://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/0822356767/
The Structure of World History: From Modes of Production to Modes of Exchange [ペーパーバック]
Kojin Karatani (著), Michael K. Bourdaghs (翻訳)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Translator's Note vii
Author's Preface to the English Translation ix
Preface xiii
Introduction. On Modes of Exchange 1
Part I. Mini World Systems 29
1. The Sedentary Revolution 35
2. The Gift and Magic 50
Part II. World-Empire 57
3. The State 63
4. World Money 81
5. World Empires 104
6. Universal Religions 127
Part III. The Modern World System 157
7. The Modern State 165
8. Industrial Capital 182
9. Nation 209
10. Associationism 228
Part IV. The Present and the Future 265
11. The Stages of Global Capitalism and Repetition 267
12. Toward a World Republic 285
Acknowledgments 309
Notes 311
Bibliography 339
Index
https://www.dukeupress.edu/The-Structure-of-World-History/
Read the Introduction - Duke University Press (Adobe PDF)
p.9
Table 1 Modes-of-Exchange Matrix
___________________________
B: Plunder and redistribution A: Reciprocity
(Domination and protection) (Gift and countergift)
C:Commodity Exchange D: X
(Money and commodities)
___________________________
Table 2 The Modern-Social-Formation Matrix
__________
B: State A: Nation
C: Capital D: X
__________
p.21
Table 3
__________________________________
Political Stateless Asiatic Ancient Feudal Modern
Superstructure state classic state state
King/ state
Economic Clan vassals Citizen / Feudal Capital /
Base (Mode of society (agricultural slave lord / proletariat
Production) community) serfs
__________________________________
p.25
Table 4
_______________________________________
Social Formation Dominant Mode of Exchange World System
_______________________________________
Clan Reciprocity Mini-system
Asiatic Plunder and redistribution (B1) World-empire
Ancient classical Plunder and redistribution (B2)
Feudal Plunder and redistribution (B3)
Capitalism Commodity Exchange World-economy
_______________________________________
p.28
Table 5 World Systems
____________________
World-empire Mini-world system
World-economy World republic
(modern world system)
____________________
p.273
TABLE 6 The World - Historical Stages of Capitalism
1750-1810 1810-1870 1870-1930 1930-1990 1990-
___________________________________________________
Global Capitalism Mercantilism Liberalism Imperialism Late capitalism Neoliberalism
Hegemonic State Britain United States
Economic Policy Imperialistic Liberalism Imperialistic Liberalism Imperialistic
Capital Merchant Industrial Finance capital State-monopoly Multinational
capital capital capital capital
World Commodity Textiles Light Heavy industry Durable information
industry consumer goods
State Absolute Nation-state Imperialism Welfare state Regionalism
monarchy
___________________________________________________
Table1 Modes-of-ExchangeMatrix
返信削除B: Plunder and redistribution (Domination and protection)
C:Commodity Exchange (Money and commodities)
A: Reciprocity
(Gift and countergift)
D: X
Table2 TheModern-Social-FormationMatrix
B: State A: Nation C: Capital D: X
there had never been anything of the sort before.”10 This suggests that the spontaneously arising council communism represents the return of mode of exchange A in a higher dimension.
Table1 Modes-of-ExchangeMatrix
返信削除_______________________
B: Plunder and redistribution A: Reciprocity
(Domination and protection) (Gift and countergift)
C:Commodity Exchange D: X
(Money and commodities)
_______________________
Table2 TheModern-Social-FormationMatrix
__________
B: State A: Nation
C: Capital D: X
__________
there had never been anything of the sort before.”10 This suggests that the spontaneously arising council communism represents the return of mode of exchange A in a higher dimension.
Table 3
返信削除Political Superstructure
Economic Base (Mode of Production)
Stateless
Clan society
Asiatic state
King/ vassals (agricultural community)
Ancient classic state
Citizen / slave
Feudal state
Feudal lord / serfs
Modern state
Capital / proletariat
Table 3
返信削除Political
Superstructure
Economic
Base (Mode of
Production)
Stateless
Clan
society
Asiatic
state
King/
vassals
(agricultural
community)
Ancient
classic
state
Citizen /
slave
Feudal
state
Feudal
lord /
serfs
Modern
state
Capital /
proletariat
Table3
返信削除Political Stateless Asiatic Ancient Feudal Modern
Superstructure state classic state state
King/ state
Economic Clan vassals Citizen / Feudal Capital /
Base (Mode of society (agricultural slave lord / proletariat
Production) community) serfs
p.25
返信削除Table 4
_______________________________________
Social Formation Dominant Mode of Exchange World System
_______________________________________
Clan Reciprocity Mini-system
Asiatic Plunder and redistribution (B1) World-empire
Ancient classical Plunder and redistribution (B2)
Feudal Plunder and redistribution (B3)
Capitalism Commodity Exchange World-economy
_______________________________________
Table 4
返信削除Social Formation
Clan
Asiatic
Ancient classical Feudal Capitalism
Dominant Mode of Exchange
Reciprocity
Plunder and redistribution (B1) Plunder and redistribution (B2) Plunder and redistribution (B3) Commodity Exchange
World System
Mini-system World-empire
World-economy
implemented only the surface trappings of the Asiatic despotic state and its attendant ideologies.
p.28
返信削除Table5 WorldSystems
____________________
World-empire Mini-world system
World-economy World republic
(modern world system)
____________________
p.9
返信削除Table 1 Modes-of-Exchange Matrix
_______________________
B: Plunder and redistribution A: Reciprocity
(Domination and protection) (Gift and countergift)
C:Commodity Exchange D: X
(Money and commodities)
_______________________
Table 2 TheModern-Social-Formation Matrix
__________
B: State A: Nation
C: Capital D: X
__________
p.21
Table 3
__________________________________
Political Stateless Asiatic Ancient Feudal Modern
Superstructure state classic state state
King/ state
Economic Clan vassals Citizen / Feudal Capital /
Base (Mode of society (agricultural slave lord / proletariat
Production) community) serfs
__________________________________
p.25
Table 4
_______________________________________
Social Formation Dominant Mode of Exchange World System
_______________________________________
Clan Reciprocity Mini-system
Asiatic Plunder and redistribution (B1) World-empire
Ancient classical Plunder and redistribution (B2)
Feudal Plunder and redistribution (B3)
Capitalism Commodity Exchange World-economy
_______________________________________
p.28
Table5 World Systems
____________________
World-empire Mini-world system
World-economy World republic
(modern world system)
____________________
返信削除p.273
TABLE 6 The World-Histolical Stages of Capitalism
1750-1810 1810-1870 1870-1930 1930-1990 1990-
___________________________________________________
Global Capitalism Mercantilism Liberalism Imperialism Late capitalism Neoliberalism
Hegemonic State Britain United States
Economic Policy Imperialistic Liberalism Imperialistic Liberalism Imperialistic
Capital Merchant Industrial Finance capital State-monopoly Multinational
capital capital capital capital
World Commodity Textiles Light Heavy industry Durable information
industry consumer goods
State Absolute Nation-state Welfare state Regionalism
monarchy
___________________________________________________