インタビュー:ポール・シェアード「日本はMMTを実践していない」
インタビュー:ポール・シェアード「日本はMMTを実践していない」
(ハーバード大学 ケネディスクール上席研究員)
Paul Sheard 1954年オーストラリア生まれ。オーストラリア·モナシュ大学卒。
オーストラリア国立大学経済修士号、同大学博士号を取得。リーマン·ブラザーズ、
野村証券チーフエコノミスト、S&Pグローバル·チーフエコノミスト、
副会長を経て2018年から現職。
米国や日本で毎年巨額の財政赤字を垂れ流し、日銀が異次元の金融緩和で、
事実上の財政ファイナンスをしている状態から、日本は「現代貨幣理論(MMT)」
を実践していると指摘される。 しかし、私は違うと言いたい。
MMTの基本的洞察は貨幣の創出者たる統合政府には、資金調達の制約がない。
金財分離の制度的枠組みが、そういう制約を恣意的に作り上げているだけだ。本
来、政府には資金の枯渇があり得ない。真の制約は、実体経済の在り方にある。
確かに2013年に黒田東彦総裁率いる日銀が大掛かりな量的緩和に踏み切ったの
は、MMTをほうふつとさせた。なぜならば、量的緩和は統合政府が返済期限のあ
る国債を返済期限のない中央銀行の負債に変形させるからだ。金融政策と財政政
策の境目を溶かす策だ。
日本の長期停滞の教訓は、金融緩和と財政出動の一体政策を欠いたことだった
と私は考えている。ゼロ金利や量的緩和政策を実施し、財政出動を実施したかと
思えば、00年にゼロ金利を解除したり、小泉政権では公共投資の削減に踏み切る
など緊縮財政に取り組んだ。
また、量的·質的金融緩和のスタートからたった1年(14年4月)で、政府が消
費税率を5%から8%への引き上げに踏み切った。まさにアクセルを踏みながら、
ブレーキを同時にかけるようなちぐはぐな政策を続けてしまった。
対照的なのは米国だ。 08年のリーマン·ショック後、米国は日本の失敗の教訓を
生かし、金融緩和と銀行資本投入も含む財政出動で景気の底割れを回避し、いち
早く回復基調を取り戻した。
翻って日本は、また過去の失敗を繰り返そうとしている。2%の消費者物価指数
(CPI) 上昇率の実現が見通せないまま、10月には財政再建への配慮から消費増税
を実施しようとしてる。日銀の黒田総裁も予定通りの消費増税実施を支持してい
る。こういうことでは、金融と財政が一体となり、財政制限を取っ払うMMTとは
程遠い。
インフレ制約
MMTの考え方では、中央銀行が無制限に紙幣を刷り、政府が積極財政を続けれ
ば、いずれ供給制約に直面してCPI上昇率は高まる。つまり、インフレ圧力が強
まる。その制約が実現するまで、財政再建が無用。むしろ有害だ。 制約実現こそ
が、政策目標達成だ。
日本のような長期デフレ状況に陥った経済には、一種のカンフル剤としてMMT
的な政策、つまり金融と財政の促足進的一体運営で景気拡大をはかり、インフレ率
を高める政策が有効だ。
具体的には、消費税引き上げの実施時期を、日銀のマネタリーベース(「日本銀
行券発行高」+「貨幣流通高」+「日銀当座預金」)の拡大継続約束の条件、つまり
CPI上昇率が安定的に2%を超えた後、と同一にすべきだ。 日本は今MMTを実施し
ていないが、政策路線を修正すれば、MMTの先駆者になりうる。
(聞き手=浜條元保・編集部)
メインバンク資本主義の危機―ビッグバンで変わる日本型経営 単行本 – 1997/7
企業メガ再編―新・日本型資本主義の幕開け単行本 – 2000/12/1
the desired net nominal saving position of the population is higher than the actual net nominal
saving position generated by the government's deficit. .. the government can safely increase
its deficit spending, lowering involuntary unemployment, to satisfy the excess desired net
nominal saving of the population.
(L. Randall Wray, Understanding Modern Money; the Key to Full Employment and
Price Stability, Edward Elgar, 1998.(『Understanding Modern Money』 P 129~130)
(非自発的失業があるということは、) 人口に対して望まれる名目純貯
蓄水準が、政府の赤字によって生み出されている実際の水準よりも高
いことを示している。(中略)…それゆえ、政府は安全に赤字支出
を増加させることができて、非自発的失業を引き下げる。その赤字支
出は、人口に対して望まれる超過名目純貯蓄を達成するものである。
MMT is consistent with any size of government. It can be a small libertarian
government if desired. But it issues a sovereign floating currency. It supports the
currency by imposing a tax payable in that currency.
A Job Guarantee/Employer of Last Resort is also consistent with any size of government.
If you want a big private sector and small government sector, keep taxes and
government spending low. That frees up resources to be used by the big private
sector. But you will still need the JG/ELR program to take up the labor resources the
private sector cannot fully employ
(L. Randall Wray, Modern Money Theory; Primer on Macroeconomics for
Sovereign Monetary Systems Second Edition, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015 P246)
MMTはどのような大きさの政府とも整合的である。もし望めば、政府は小さな
通貨を維持しているのである。
JG/ELR(職の保障·最後の雇い手としての役割)もまたどのような大きさの政府とも
We will argue that stable prices and truly full employment are possible and,
indeed, are complements.
The government can guarantee a zero unemployment rate, meaning that all
only those unwilling (or unable) to work at the going wage would be left without work
(『Understanding Modern Money』P121)
我々は安定的な価格と本当に完全な雇用は実現可能である
政府は失業率ゼロを保証できる。つまり、現行賃金で働く準
ということである。現行賃金では働く意思(もしくはその能
カ)のないものだけが、職についていないままとなる。
ELR might increase aggregate supply (or potential output) and thereby place downward
pressure on prices, rather than causing inflation.
(『Understanding Modern Money』P133)
最後の雇い手は総供給(潜在的産出)を増加させ、それゆえ、インフレを引き起こすのではなく、
価格には引き下げ圧力が加えられるかもしれないのである。
Paul Sheard
Paul James Sheard (born November 25, 1954) is an Australian-American economist. He is Senior Fellow at Harvard Kennedy School's Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government,[1] after previously being Vice Chairman of S&P Global.[2] Sheard has held chief economist positions at Lehman Brothers, Nomura Securities, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, and S&P Global. Prior to entering financial markets in 1995, he was an academic economist based in Australia, Japan and the United States, specializing in the Japanese economy and the economics of firm organization. He is a member of the World Economic Forum's Global Future Council on the New Economic Agenda and was a member of the WEF's Global Agenda Council on the International Monetary System (2010-2012).[3] He is a member of the board of the Foreign Policy Association and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bretton Woods Committee[4] and the Economic Club of New York. He attends and speaks regularly at conferences around the world,[5][6][7][8] and his views on the global economy and economic policy are frequently cited in the international press.[9][10][11][12][13]
Contents
Career
Sheard was Kiyoshi Kojima Postdoctoral Fellow at the Australia-Japan Research Centre,[14] ANU, Lecturer in Economics, and later Associate Professor of Economics at Osaka University. He held visiting scholar positions at Osaka University, the Bank of Japan, and Stanford University, where he was also visiting assistant professor of economics.
In January 1995, Sheard became Japan Strategist for Baring Asset Management and later Head of Japan Equity Investments. In September 2000, he was appointed Chief Economist for Asia of Lehman Brothers and became Global Chief Economist of Lehman in April 2006. When Lehman failed in September 2008, after a stint at Barclays Capital, in November 2008 Sheard was appointed Global Chief Economist and Head of Economic Research at Nomura Securities, based in New York.[15] In June 2012, he moved to Standard & Poor's Ratings Services as Global Chief Economist and Head of Global Economics and Research and a member of the firm's executive committee, later becoming Chief Economist and Executive Vice President of S&P Global, the parent firm.
Sheard served as a member of committees of the Japanese Government's Economic Deliberation Council, in 1997-98 as an appointee of Prime Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto and in 1998-99 as an appointee of Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi. He served as a member of the oversight board of the Japanese Government's Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry,[16] 2001-2006. From 2003 to 2010, Sheard served as a non-executive director of ORIX Corporation, a large Japanese financial services firm.
Contributions
Sheard's academic work analyzed the economic rationale of distinct features of Japanese corporate organization, including the role of multi-tier subcontracting networks in the auto sector ;[17] the role of main banks and interlocking shareholdings in creating an internalized market for corporate control that supported the "lifetime" employment system;[18][19][20] the informational and risk-sharing role of general trading companies (Sogo shosha) as financial intermediaries;[21] and assessing the arguments that Japanese firms avoided short-termism.[22] In the "structural impediments" debate of the early 1990s, Sheard argued that many of the features criticized as "non-tariff barriers" or as being anti-competitive were better understood in terms of how firms and markets in Japan were efficiently organized.[23] He pointed out that the common practice of characterizing keiretsu or affiliated enterprise groups in Japan as "horizontal groups" was confusing because to many foreign observers "horizontal" connoted within-same-market whereas most of the relationships in question were "vertical" (between stages of production) or between-market in nature.[24]
As a markets economist in Tokyo, Sheard was active in the policy debate, identifying two factors as contributing to Japan's falling into and remaining in deflation: the failure of the government to aggressively recapitalize the banks after it issued a blanket guarantee of deposits in June 1995 and the aggregate demand management policy mix, under macro deleveraging, of "timid" monetary policy and stop-start fiscal policy.[25]
After the Global Financial Crisis and Great Recession, Sheard argued that sustained, aggressive monetary and fiscal policy expansion was needed to restore lost aggregate demand in the developed economies.[26]
He has argued that quantitative easing (QE), far from being inflationary "money printing," is best viewed as a "debt management operation of the consolidated government" whereby the central bank retires government debt securities and refinances them into central bank money,[27] and that, contrary to common parlance, banks cannot "lend out" their excess reserves.[28] Sheard argues that, QE being a mild form of monetary easing, the unwinding of QE, in principle, is an innocuous process.[29]
Invoking the metaphor of a "Monetary Garden of Eden",[30] Sheard has argued that monetary and fiscal policies should be viewed as "two sides of the same sovereign coin" and much more closely coordinated and aligned.[31][32]
Sheard has argued that monetary union without fiscal union in the euro area is unsustainable, describing the architecture of the euro area at the time of the sovereign debt crisis as akin to putting countries, when hit by a sudden loss of aggregate demand, in a "macroeconomic vice," and that a steady-state solution must involve "either less monetary union or more fiscal union."[33] Sheard identifies the fundamental problem with the economic and political architecture of the European Union as being the "selective sharing of sovereignty," viewing Brexit as being as much about the future of the EU as about the UK's relationship with the EU.[34]
Long a critic of the Bank of Japan's monetary policy communication and action,[35] Sheard has been a strong supporter of the Bank's April 2013 policy shift under Governor Haruhiko Kuroda,[36] describing it as the monetary policy equivalent of a Copernican Revolution.[37]
Education
Sheard received a Bachelor of Arts (Honours in Japanese and Geography) from Monash University (1981) and a PhD in Japanese Economy (1986) and Master of Economics (1988) from the ANU.[38][39]
Awards and recognition
Sheard's 1981 undergraduate thesis was awarded the Institute of Australian Geographers’ Honours Thesis of the Year.[40] His 1997 book in Japanese, Mein Banku Shihon Shugi no Kiki (The Crisis of Main Bank Capitalism),[41] published by Toyo Keizai Shinposha, was awarded the 1998 Suntory Gakugei Prize in the Economics-Politics Section. In 2006, Sheard was recognized by Advance as one of 100 Leading Global Australians.[42][43]
In May 2019, Monash University conferred an honorary Doctor of Laws on Sheard.
Books
- International Adjustment and the Japanese Firm (editor), Allen & Unwin, 1991, ISBN 1 86373 418X
- Japanese Firms, Finance, and Markets (editor), Addison Wesley Longman, 1996, ISBN 0582 81108 2
- Mein banku shihon shugi no kiki: biggu ban de kawaru Nihongata keiei (The Crisis of Main Bank Capitalism: How Japanese-style Management Will Change with "Big Bang") (in Japanese), Toyo Keizai Shinposha,1997, ISBN 4-492-39248-3
- Kigyo mega saihen: Shin Nihongata shihon shugi no maku ake (Corporate Mega Restructuring: The Curtain Opens on a New Japanese Capitalism) (in Japanese), Toyo Keizai Shinposha, 2000, ISBN 4-492-39335-8
References
- ^ "Paul Sheard". Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government. Retrieved September 4, 2018.
- ^ "Stocks". Bloomberg.com. January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
- ^ "Paul Sheard". World Economic Forum. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
- ^ Noort, Jeff van den. "The Bretton Woods 2014 Conference - Delegates and Contributors - The Center for Financial Stability". www.centerforfinancialstability.org.
- ^ "Paul Sheard - The Institute of International Finance". www.iif.com.
- ^ "Session on subprime crisis held at BFA - Xinhua - English.news.cn". news.xinhuanet.com.
- ^ "Global Conference 2016 - Speaker: Paul Sheard". www.milkeninstitute.org.
- ^ Limited, Alamy. "Stock Photo - Boao, China's Hainan Province. 26th Mar, 2017. Paul Sheard, Executive VP & Chief Economist of S&P Global, speaks at the session of". Alamy.
- ^ "Sheard: Will be interesting to see how President Trump remakes the Fed". CNBC.
- ^ Source, CNBC US (November 21, 2017). "Sheard: Will be interesting to see how President Trump remakes the Fed". CNBC. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
- ^ "Paul Sheard - Latest & Breaking News on Paul Sheard - Photos, Videos, Breaking Stories and Articles on Paul Sheard". Moneycontrol. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
- ^ Editorial, Reuters (January 18, 2017). "It's complicated! Don't view Brexit as hard or soft: S&P". U.S. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
- ^ Coy, Peter (November 12, 2013). "What Billionaire Ray Dalio Gets Wrong About Money". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
- ^ https://ajrc.crawford.anu.edu.au/
- ^ https://www.investmentbank.barclays.com/
- ^ https://www.rieti.go.jp/en/
- ^ “Auto production systems in Japan: organizational and locational features,” Australian Geographical Studies, 21(1), pp.46-68, 1983
- ^ https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/interlocking-shareholdings.asp
- ^ “Main banks and internal capital markets in Japan,” Shoken Keizai, 157, pp.255-285, 1986
- ^ “The main bank system and corporate monitoring and control in Japan,” Journal of Economic Organization and Behavior, 11, pp.399-422, 1989
- ^ “The Japanese general trading company as an aspect of interfirm risk-sharing,” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 3(3), pp.308-322, 1989
- ^ “Long-termism and the Japanese firm,” in Mitsuaki Okabe (editor), The Structure of the Japanese Economy: Changes on the Domestic and International Fronts, Macmillan Press, pp.25-52, 1994
- ^ “The economics of Japanese corporate organization and the ‘structural impediments’ debate,” Japanese Economic Studies, 19(4), pp.30-78, 1991
- ^ “Keiretsu, competition, and market access,” in Edward M. Graham and J. David Richardson (editors), Global Competition Policies, Institute for International Economics, pp.501-546, 1997
- ^ “The Japanese economy: where is it leading in the Asia Pacific?,” in Mari Pangestu and Ligang Song (editors), Japan’s future in East Asia and the Pacific: In honour of Professor Peter Drysdale, Asia Pacific Press, pp.1-30, 2007
- ^ “Navigating historic times,” Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services Ratings Direct, Oct. 8, 2012
- ^ “A QE Q&A: Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Quantitative Easing,” Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services Ratings Direct, Aug. 7, 2014
- ^ “Repeat After Me: Banks Cannot And Do Not ‘Lend Out’ Reserves,” Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services RatingsDirect, Aug. 13, 2013; http://positivemoney.org/2013/08/repeat-after-me-banks-can-not-and-do-not-lend-out-reserves-sp-report/
- ^ “QExit Q&A: Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About The Exit From Quantitative Easing,” Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services Ratings Direct, Aug. 17, 2017; https://www.barrons.com/articles/investors-need-not-fear-qexit-but-it-will-lead-to-higher-rates-1502996982
- ^ “Time For Some Blue-Sky Thinking On The Future Of Macroeconomic Policy S&P Global Ratings RatingsDirect, March 24, 2016; “Helicopter Money And The Monetary Garden Of Eden,” S&P Global Ratings RatingsDirect, May 4, 2016
- ^ Vonnegut, Andrew (5 September 2017). "Inside the Global Economy: A Practical Guide". Rowman & Littlefield – via Google Books.
- ^ "Quantitative Easing Webinar With Dr. Paul Sheard & Professor XXXXXX".; https://www.afr.com/markets/macroeconomics-needs-a-reboot-says-economist-paul-sheard-20180708-h12edr
- ^ “Navigating Historic Times...With No Room For Error,” Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services RatingsDirect, Oct. 8, 2012
- ^ “Brexit’s Wake-Up Call to the EU: Selectively Sharing Sovereignty Is Not Sustainable,” S&P Global Ratings RatingsDirect, July 22, 2016; https://briefingsforbrexit.com/brexit-is-a-wake-up-call-to-the-eu-but-so-far-it-is-not-being-answered-by-paul-sheard/
- ^ “Japanese Reflation Is In Play, But Hurdles Galore Stand In The Way,” Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services RatingsDirect, Jan. 3, 2013
- ^ “Change Of The Guard--And The Deflation Storyline--At The Bank of Japan,” Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services RatingsDirect, March 28, 2013; “All You Need To Know About ‘Abenomics,’” Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services RatingsDirect, June 12, 2013
- ^ “The Bank Of Japan Breaks New Ground Yet Again--And It May Work This Time,” S&P Global Ratings RatingsDirect, Oct. 7, 2016
- ^ "An eye for the big picture". Monash University.
- ^ https://crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/events/attachments/2016-02/washington_workshop_summary_march_2016_.pdf
- ^ https://www.iag.org.au/
- ^ Malcolm, J.P. (2013). Financial Globalization and the Opening of the Japanese Economy. Taylor & Francis. p. 379. ISBN 978-1-136-85502-3. Retrieved December 31, 2017.
- ^ https://www.advance.org/
- ^ https://www.advance.org/media/files/file/05_Delegates.pdf
インタビュー:ポール・シェアード「日本はMMTを実践していない」
米国や日本で毎年巨額の財政赤字を垂れ流し、日銀が異次元の金融緩和で、
事実上の財政ファイナンスをしている状態から、日本は「現代貨幣理論(MMT)」
を実践していると指摘される。 しかし、私は違うと言いたい。
MMTの基本的洞察は貨幣の創出者たる統合政府には、資金調達の制約がない。
金財分離の制度的枠組みが、そういう制約を恣意的に作り上げているだけだ。本
来、政府には資金の枯渇があり得ない。真の制約は、実体経済の在り方にある。
確かに2013年に黒田東彦総裁率いる日銀が大掛かりな量的緩和に踏み切ったの
は、MMTをほうふつとさせた。なぜならば、量的緩和は統合政府が返済期限のあ
る国債を返済期限のない中央銀行の負債に変形させるからだ。金融政策と財政政
策の境目を溶かす策だ。
日本の長期停滞の教訓は、金融緩和と財政出動の一体政策を欠いたことだった
と私は考えている。ゼロ金利や量的緩和政策を実施し、財政出動を実施したかと
思えば、00年にゼロ金利を解除したり、小泉政権では公共投資の削減に踏み切る
など緊縮財政に取り組んだ。
また、量的・質的金融緩和のスタートからたった1年(14年4月)で、政府が消
費税率を5%から8%への引き上げに踏み切った。まさにアクセルを踏みながら、
ブレーキを同時にかけるようなちぐはぐな政策を続けてしまった。
対照的なのは米国だ。 08年のリーマン・ショック後、米国は日本の失敗の教訓を
生かし、金融緩和と銀行資本投入も含む財政出動で景気の底割れを回避し、いち
早く回復基調を取り戻した。
翻って日本は、また過去の失敗を繰り返そうとしている。2%の消費者物価指数
(CPI) 上昇率の実現が見通せないまま、10月には財政再建への配慮から消費増税
を実施しようとしてる。日銀の黒田総裁も予定通りの消費増税実施を支持してい
る。こういうことでは、金融と財政が一体となり、財政制限を取っ払うMMTとは
程遠い。
インフレ制約
MMTの考え方では、中央銀行が無制限に紙幣を刷り、政府が積極財政を続けれ
ば、いずれ供給制約に直面してCPI上昇率は高まる。つまり、インフレ圧力が強
まる。その制約が実現するまで、財政再建が無用。むしろ有害だ。 制約実現こそ
が、政策目標達成だ。
日本のような長期デフレ状況に陥った経済には、一種のカンフル剤としてMMT
的な政策、つまり金融と財政の促足進的一体運営で景気拡大をはかり、インフレ率
を高める政策が有効だ。
具体的には、消費税引き上げの実施時期を、日銀のマネタリーベース(「日本銀
行券発行高」+「貨幣流通高」+「日銀当座預金」)の拡大継続約束の条件、つまり
CPI上昇率が安定的に2%を超えた後、と同一にすべきだ。 日本は今MMTを実施し
ていないが、政策路線を修正すれば、MMTの先駆者になりうる。